The HILJ Online Symposium is a week-long discussion by scholars and practitioners on selected print articles from the Harvard International Law Journal. The Symposium takes place on the Opinio Juris website once or twice a year and features responses by scholars and practitioners selected by the Journal and sur-responses by the original authors.
The schedule for HILJ Online Symposium: Volumes 54(2) & 55(1) was as follows
- Monday, March 31, 2014: Response and Sur-response to Anthea Roberts, State-to-State Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Hybrid Theory of Interdependent Rights and Shared Interpretive Authority, 55 Harv. Int’l L.J. 1 (2014). Response authored by Martins Paparinskis.
- Tuesday, April 1, 2014: Response and Sur-response to Monica Hakimi, Unfriendly Unilateralism, 55 Harv. Int’l L.J. 105 (2014). Response authored by Tim Meyer.
- Wednesday, April 2, 2014: Response and Sur-response to Gregory H. Shill, Ending Judgment Arbitrage: Jurisdictional Competition and the Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in the United States, 54 Harv. Int’l L.J. 459 (2013). Response authored by Christopher A. Whytock.
- Thursday, April 3, 2014: Response to János Fiala-Butora, Michael Ashley Stein & Janet E. Lord, The Democratic Life of the Union: Toward Equal Voting Participation for Europeans with Disabilities, 55 Harv. Int’l L.J. 71 (2014). Response authored by Michael Waterstone.
- Friday, April 4, 2014: Response and Sur-response to Suzanne Katzenstein, In the Shadow of Crisis: The Creation of International Courts in the Twentieth Century, 55 Harv. Int’l L.J. 151 (2014). Response authored by Karen J. Alter.