John Bellinger raises an important question with respect to the ongoing detention policy debate: “Do we have it legally wrong, and if so, how should we do it differently, in a way that would work better?” Writing with specific reference to the jurisdiction-stripping aspects of the Military Commissions Act (“MCA”), Gerald Neuman replies that we do have it wrong, and that habeas review must be extended at least to the Guantánamo detainees. A panel of the D.C. Circuit recently rejected that argument in Boumediene v. Bush, and at the time of this writing a petition for certiorari in that case is pending in the Supreme Court. Bearing this in mind, I would like to consider the different paths that may lie ahead with respect to the issue of judicial review of combatant status determinations.
* This excerpt does not include citations. To read the entire article, including supporting notes, please download the PDF.
Latest posts by hlsjrnldev (see all)
- The Justice Conundrum: Africa’s Turbulent Relationship with the ICC - February 18, 2019
- ECtHR Orders Permanent Ban: Can international courts impose disciplinary measures on legal representatives? - February 13, 2019
- Measuring Transformation: At the 50th anniversary of the American Convention on Human Rights, a move to maximize its structural impact - February 6, 2019